10.31.08
Posted in Glögg Is Life. at 4:42 am by Gregory
Hi. Spooky day, and almost everybody in America is paranoid — so I request that inferences to comments be kept to a minimum. Writing is what I do because I mostly don’t have anything else to do, and I think yoga is stupid.
So it goes.
Warning to impressionable old people (youths, these days, have seen and done everything so many times it would make your head spin): This posting contains topics dealing with both Siblings and Sexuality — but I shall endeavour to keep them far enough apart that any of those pesky inferences don’t get made.
What the hey — let’s do the Sexuality first: Only ten minutes ago, I was startled by some extremely eerie orgasmic moaning, courtesy of one of my female neighbours. I won’t lie to you: I like female orgasmic moaning quite a lot — see, “ladies,” I hope it’s not too much of a stretch for me to speak for all straight adult male humans for a moment, simply to say that WE LIKE IT WHEN YOU’RE HAPPY AND FEEL GOOD. Of course, somebody else’s partner’s female orgasmic moaning isn’t really any of my business — but, frankly, when it comes (pun vaguely intended) blasting through my windows in the middle of the night, it kinda is.
This was a weird one, though — long, high, heaving sounds; at first I thought it was one of those misleading echoes of the night — such as a cat catching a surprise fuck or a baby crying. But it was definitely adult female orgasmic moaning. Mainly I’m surprised anybody is still awake. (Most people around here work hard, play hard, sleep hard — and think extremely softly.)
Hey — digression, but — I wonder why, in English, “hardly” is not the adverb form of “hard” (which is, simply, “hard”). We, for instance, hump softly — but we pump hard. Odd.
The funnier expulsion of random female orgasmic energy came (pun very intended; if also stupid) earlier — it was perhaps 10:30 pm, and I was walking back, and THE LOUDEST WOMAN-CUMMING SOUNDS I’VE EVER HEARD IN PUBLIC issued forth (pun intended) to bang (pun intended) upon those nocturnal sugar walls (oh, jesus).
I studied sound in college, and I’m pretty good at identifying its subtleties. The moans earlier this evening were definitely genuine — and pitched just this side of screaming. It was very impressive — I mean, it must have carried over an entire city block — plus it was very amusing. This woman — whoever she was — clearly wanted the whole world to share in her experience.
I offered up a little “golf-clap,” and kept walking.
(It was really fucking funny, though [pun...well, whatever].)
This causes me to wonder: For the past several years, I have been inhabiting a place where such vital Life-qualities as Love, Romance, Sweetness and even Gentleness are essentially unknown, unperceived. Sexual passion — it’s cheap and easy — but I’ve hardly had to tell anybody to “get a room” in quite some “time,” too. Which brings forth the wonderment:
Why now?
Why are these local women crying out like hyaenas (”hyaenae”?) in heat? (Really: This is not me eavesdropping; this is like leaf-blower LOUD.)
I noticed, looking up at the sky today, that the firmament was severely criss-crossed with “jet-streams” — you know, those bizarre white lines of inexplicable “cloud” that don’t seem to have been emitted by conventional aeroplanes — but there they are, all the same. I am very much not a paranoiac — in fact, if there’s a monster, I’d rather just have it come after me and do its business than sit around worrying about it — however, paranoiacs believe that these “jet-streams” (or whatever they call them) have something to do with…government mind-control schemes of the populace, or some kind of chemically-induced psychological experimentation, or whatever (I’d say TV is much, much, much worse — but nobody would listen; nobody ever does).
If you’re a sharp little tool, you probably saw this coming, but: I wonder if today’s nerve-gases sprayed through the atmosphere had any effect on…making local women particularly loud whilst in the throes.
Hm.
Don’t stop, though, “ladies” — come/cum all day long, if you want. I mean, if it’s a healing process for you, then go for it. (Men who would complain would probably all fit inside one yoga studio.)
Enough with the Sexuality, anyway; I just found tonight’s outbursts entertaining.
*
What else? Well, alas, today I received the news that I will not have the option of moving into a friend’s remote outpost for the winter. He doesn’t think it would be a good idea. It’s his choice, so I honour it. I suspect that there’s some projection afoot, though — probably very few people (especially in hyper-ADD America) could comprehend how pleasurable it would be for me to live someplace quiet, cold and cozy for a few months — and if alone, then alone (having experienced such settings before, I can tell you in confidence that the feeling is far less lonely than being mostly on one’s own in a city overflowing with insane freaks).
Oh, well. I listened to his case, stated my own, and accepted his choice. The one thing I definitely do not wish to do is to cause him (or anyone else) to worry about my wellbeing whilst abiding under their bonus roof.
The thing is, though — that energy was all set to pop. Now it’s stymied. Recent potential employers have gone mute on me, and friends here are up to the usual “MEEE!!! MEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!” bullshit — and I figure, although I like L.A. well enough as an Entertainment Machine, that these past thirteen and a half years have added up to more than enough of a chapter of discontentment for me. (Sometimes it’s mild, sometimes ferocious — but it’s never gone, never fully dissipated.)
This leads me to think of Ian Fleming’s story, “Quantum of Solace” — and how, ironically (since I don’t care about the forthcoming movie), I may consider it the best (popular) thing he ever wrote. I’m sure that the movie has little or nothing to do with the Fleming’s concept (a friend saw it recently, and offered comments), but the story is actually an anti-Bond non-adventure. Bond spends almost the entirety of the piece sitting in a quiet room, drinking brandy. The story proper concerns an older authority figure describing (to a somewhat cheeky Bond) the horrors of emotional abuse in a relationship he intimately observed — which, in itself, would make for a fascinating study of human nature — but Fleming one-ups the expectations (mine, anyway) by leading off with the cliché of a lying whore with a heart of shit — but then describing the punishments from her husband, whose potential for icy, measured vengeance was never apparent until the femme-creep used and abused him. He concludes with the notion that the bitch was essentially a slow-burning spark for igniting the soul-garbage within the man, mostly placed there by his parents, long before she toyed with, and ruined, him. Quite a fascinating little portrait, really — plus Fleming allows the bitch, following some protracted punishment, to get off, get away, start anew, and play “happy” for (presumably) the remainder of her days — while Bond heads off to his next “exciting” assignment feeling rather sick and empty inside. It’s pretty cool. I’m sure it’s loads better than the movie.
I mention it, however, because — although I’ll bet “Quantum of Solace” is used extremely stupidly for the movie, as the title and theme of the story, it’s a rather masterful term, meaning, approximately: “Measure of Comfort”. As in: Hurt is hurt — people hurt each other constantly, usually accidentally — at worst (generally) due to some glitch which, over time, they may be able, in shared company, to repair. But total disregard — this is the stuff of true Horror. Think about it: That person really does not care whether you live or die — or suffer on and on and on.
That, friends, is Scary.
I don’t want to climb out too far on the limb of this Hallowe’en Tree (tip of hat to Bradbury) — because I do have some friends, and I can perceive Beauty (many, by the look of this world, cannot), and for some reason I’m actually pretty good at carrying on, whether or not anybody else in the whole world cares in the slightest. (Not the best of inspirations — not an inspiration at all, really — but it does keep me going.)
Despite managing reasonably well in a place literally crawling with insane people (no mean feat), I do feel a pang at the notion of this “Quantum of Solace” — here, let me describe it, just a bit:
- Siblings very obviously do not care whether I live or die; they have very, very, very coldly disregarded me for years on end (and now, I sincerely wish I could get a refund on all the kindness, energy and sheer travel I put forth to be loving and supportive toward them — a waste!)
- “Father” (he survived the surgery, incidentally; I’m not sure I care) brought such hideousness down on me, exactly when I finally started getting a career together — and, nine years later, he’s still a cold, bitter, rotten man. When I watch people adoringly pick up their dogs’ shit every day, it pummels me: My “father” has illustrated beyond question that he has no interest, whatsoever, in being intelligent, supportive or even vaguely kind toward me. These people treat their dog’s excrement with more care than my “father” has ever offered me.
Talk about not getting one’s “Quantum of Solace”!
I have also been physically attacked by people who, when an apology was demanded of them, chose to sneer and make more threats. I have been viciously, coldly terminated by a company to which I gave my heart and soul for several years of sleepless nights and apeshit-crazy days. (Hints: Don’t ever expect your “Quantum of Solace” from alcoholics, rednecks, or both.) Some of my friends are dead and gone, and others are just gone, but in either case we’ll never speak together again (no Solace there). And I have certainly paid much more than my share of dues toward “the fair sex” — in terms of dinner, travel, assistance, whatever — only to learn that the returning gesture is not a hug, not a kiss, and certainly not a courteous and wonderful relationship — it is, instead, the emotional equivalent of catching diarrhea in the face, as she’s turning to leave.
Is it all L.A.? I’m not sure.
I’m stinging a little bit, tonight, actually, because I invited a married friend (and her husband) to the Ed Wood thing next week — and instead of being even vaguely supportive (”Hey, we’d love to attend! — And if we can’t, I hope it goes well!”) — instead I got the sort of, “I’m not interested, I don’t like that, I don’t care” spiel that has come to be the hallmark of L.A. communication.
It’s cold; it’s cold. (And yet the air is hot. It sucks.)
I cajole myself back to some reasonable level of mirth by noting: All this female friend seems to care about is stupid-ass “bad-boy” rock and, of course, having anal-tongue-sex with her dog.
When I think of it that way, I don’t feel so bad.
This is a city of opportunists — heck, a whole nation of ‘em. (”Gimme what I want, right now — and then fuck off!”)
Don’t count on much — the programming is faulty. Have a laugh, move on. If somebody is about to get hit by a train, at least find a fallen branch to shove them off the tracks. Do what is required of you. But don’t count on consistency, and don’t count on faith. Don’t count on that Quantum of Solace.
I’m sorry if this reads as hideously depressing — but for me the reflection is mainly clinical: It is the lion’s share of my actual experience. Most people I know either have truly hideous anger-management issues (which make them behave like monkeys on meth), or they’re so far up their own assholes in terms of ego that pleasant, easygoing conversation is out of the question (”MEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!! MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”), or everything turns to money (which is saddest of all). I keep my chin up for the populace at large (which is far from being an inspiring group, in this place) — but the actual paradigms I have been experiencing have been, primarily, discouraging and depressing.
Why is this?
I wonder.
Related side-note: I do realise that a little kindness goes a long way. In general, I tend to be kind to strangers — particularly service workers — and these tiny gestures of humanity (I make, for instance, eye contact) seem (or so it seems to me) to be appreciated by the recipient. I hope they are. I don’t presently have much to give in the way of fiscal or material assets — but I can be nice to people. In an almost entirely fucked system (which is very likely to get worse — no matter which VP shortly thereafter takes over the Office), surely this has some value.
The question which nags me, however, is: Does all this “random kindness” really make any difference — and, being wholly selfish for a moment, does it get me any closer to having anything resembling a Life?
Thirteen and a half years (for just this particular chapter): I’d say it’s starting to look mostly like: Not.
The one lesson I have learnt is not to be a shithead-magnet anymore. Here’s the cure: “Oh, you’re a shithead? G’bye!”
*
And so I turn to the Sibling problem. I don’t know what cruel joker in the other dimension saw fit to saddle me with two older sisters who both suck — but man, did I ever get a raw deal in this department. This is open to debate — but I’d win for sure. I’m an uncle five times — and I showed up for everything I could (this was usually not in any way productive for me personally). Ask a teeny little favour of my sisters, though, and — you guessed it:
You don’t even get the Quantum of Solace.
Today is a kind of anniversary — the sort of day which tells me what I need to know.
One year ago — one full calendar Earth-year ago — I asked, during an otherwise pleasant conversation I instigated, for one of my sisters to please call me back for three minutes within the next couple of days — that I might hear from her the best window for holiday travel, so I could book my flights and make my plans.
It is now exactly one year later. I have heard nothing. Not a word. Zero.
The concept of a Telephone, apparently, has become Deeply Mysterious, even Daunting!
It’s odd: A little bit — a little bit, and I’ll do a lot in return. And I’m no martyr — I loathe suffering, and refuse to make any sort of case of it.
But total and utter coldness and abandonment? Constant insult to injury?
Fuck you, “family.” Fuck you up your stupid monkey asses.
It’s sickening.
I’ll remain honest, fair and true until I either get a Life or have to drown myself — but I’m not even going to humour my “family” anymore. Fuck them up their stupid monkey asses.
A whole year!
*
Ick.
Oh — speaking of that, the fish died. It was a while ago. It wasn’t technically “ick” — apparently one of them just got old, and the other responded by getting so lonely in his absence that she went belly-up.
I’d like to have rabbits again — they’re much better than dogs or cats (I have decided that dogs and cats are for insane people — you know, people who desperately wish to project human personalities onto toadying, deformed predators. Rabbits allow no such farces; they just are what they are; I like that.)
Incidentally — lest this provoke the worry of Americans for whom dogs and cats constitute an unspoken religion — I don’t dislike dogs or cats. I tend to be nice to them unless they’re patently horrible. I just think that people who are dependent upon them are pathetic.
Hm.
*
Well, anyway, Happy Hallowe’en.
Bleh.
~G
Permalink
10.30.08
Posted in Glögg Is Life. at 1:42 pm by Gregory
Hiya!
Humble correspondent Gregory here.
Actually: I am everywhere.
I am Gregory, and I stand today at the crossroads of history…
But anyway, in this season of explosive political tension and robustly televised campaign monkeyshines, I have for you this ABSOLUTELY EXCLUSIVE ÜBERCINÉ.COM EXPOSÉ ON TWO OF THE MOST INFLUENTIAL FIGURES IN THE WHOLE WORLD!! — whom I managed to catch off-guard during their SECRET SUMMIT, for this ABSOLUTELY EXCLUSIVE ÜBERCINÉ.COM EXPOSÉ!
The figures we know well: They are PALIN and BUSH — and I’m so incredibly good at my extremely important “job” that I caught them out during one of their secret summits of unabashed socio-economic canoodling — and, in my outrageously professional way, I then coaxed them into an Exclusive ÜberCiné.com Interview AND nabbed a hot little photo op! Thus, behold — PALIN…and BUSH:

PALIN!…and BUSH!
Naturally, as we all happened to converge in 1979 (?), I was as mildly surprised by our spiritual confluence as were they — but my wits about me I kept, resulting in the following ABSOLUTELY EXCLUSIVE ÜBERCINÉ.COM EXPOSÉ-type…interview…thingie. Dig:
Gregory: Bush…you first: Please tell my millions of readers how you perceive the current state of our planet and its denizens.
Bush: Wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow; unbelievable.
Gregory: Indeed, thank you. Palin, now one for you: Obviously, you’re sitting pretty now — but before you got into this game, what was your original goal?
Palin: I…I wanted to be…a LUMBERJACK!
Gregory: I see. Need any higher education for that? Bachelor’s degree? Something?
Palin: I cut down trees; I wear high heels; Suspendies and a brarrr…
Gregory: “Brarrr”?
Bush: Shh.
Palin: I wish I’d been a girlie! — Just like my dear Paparrr!
Gregory: Yes, thank you…Palin. Now…Bush…the situation between an increasingly beleaguered United States and an increasingly agitated Iran grows ever more volatile. What do you suggest?
Bush: If I only could, I’d make a deal with god — and I’d get him to swap our places.
Gregory: Excellent. Thank you, Bush. I adore you. How’s about I kiss your toes? — ahem — that is to say: And what of the young servicemen, who are valiantly giving their lives to protect the interests of Big Oil?
Bush: Give the kid the pick of pips, and give him all your stripes and ribbons; now he’s sitting in his hole, he might as well have buttons and bows.
Gregory: Thank you, Bush — I cannot possibly put into words how much I love you. Now…Palin…the situation in Iraq–
Palin: True power derives from a mandate from the masses! Not from some farcical aquatic ceremony!
Gregory: Erm…thank you. The question, though, Palin — the situation in Iraq, Afghanistan and Detroit continues, on a daily basis, to worsen. What sort of tactics can you offer for bringing about a resolution — and, dare I suggest it, Peace?
Palin: Our chief weapon is surprise…surprise and fear…fear and surprise…. Our two weapons are fear and surprise…and ruthless efficiency…. Our three weapons are fear, surprise, and ruthless efficiency…and an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope…. Our four…no… Amongst our weapons…. Amongst our weaponry…are such elements as fear, surprise…. I’ll come in again.
Bush: Don’t push your foot on the heartbrake!
Gregory: You know, I get almost every single note out of your psyche, woman (I even love The Red Shoes) — but after thirty years, I still don’t have a clue what you mean by that.
Palin: I will not have my fwiends widiculed by the common soldiewy!
Gregory: Wha-haht? But I–
Palin: Now…anyone else feel like a little giggle when I mention my fwiend…Biggus…Dickus? He has a wife you know. Called Incontinentia. Incontinentia Buttocks!
Bush: Get out of my house!!!
Gregory: Easy…easy. It’s all right. So…Bush…how do you feel about the current administration?
Bush: Big stripey lie moving; like a wavy line; coming up behind — All young gentle dreams drowning in life’s grief.
Gregory: True that. Palin? Any solutions?
Palin: Try and be nice to people, avoid eating fat, read a good book every now and then, get some walking in, and try and live together in peace and harmony with people of all creeds and nations.
Gregory: Hm. Tidy. With all due respect to your novels, travel programmes and that “Ripping Yarns” thing (whatever that was about), thank you, Palin — we’ll let that be your closing statement, lest this gag overstay its already tenuous welcome. Now…Bush…
Bush: Yes?
Gregory: Precisely the answer I’ve been longing to hear. Erm…yes. Bush…Ms. Bush…Mrs. Bush, if the Universe must pummel my heart thusly — hast thou…ahem!…do you have…a projected outlook for us?
Bush: [Emits that crazy laugh -- like at the beginning of "The Fog"]
Gregory: What?…what?…c’mon — What?
Bush: Do you really want to know?
Gregory: Yes. Yes, I do.
Bush: I just know that something good is gonna happen.
FIN.
Here’s that astounding photo (of a photo) I took, again:

PALIN!…and BUSH!
And looky here! Although this ABSOLUTELY EXCLUSIVE ÜBERCINÉ.COM EXPOSÉ-type…interview…thingie…was lovingly crafted from memory, nonetheless, when I “surfed” a bit to double-check a syllable or two, I discovered this:
http://www.michaelpalinforpresident.com
And — actually — I couldn’t agree more. I love all the Pythons, but I’ve always admired Palin (Michael!) ever so slightly the most — and hey, apparently iffy minds think similarly: I would very, very, very sincerely welcome Michael Palin as President of the United States, with massive approval and a lifelong, shuddering sense of relief!
This is your humble correspondent Gregory — a.k.a. “Mr. Hope/Change/Repeat” — signing off for now (there’ll be a brief Hallowe’en blip tomorrow).
(With enormous appreciation to Kate Bush and Michael Palin — the latter of whom actually sang two verses of “Finland” to me personally once; and the former of whom actually sings to me in my dreams pretty much constantly.)
(Now you know. I am Gregory — single, turning 40 in two weeks, and, thus, wont to do this sort of thingie.)
Songs: “Wow” by Kate Bush; “Finland” by Terry Jones, Michael Palin and…Fred Tomlinson?
(And if somebody asks really nicely, I may just spill the beans on the origin of Kate Bush’s biggest-charting single ever…which, as far as I know, nobody has ever, up to now, outed!)
~G
Permalink
10.29.08
Posted in Glögg Is Life. at 7:42 pm by Gregory
A couple of days ago, I was notified that writer and film critic Carina Chocano was fired from the Los Angeles Times (released; let go; whatever, means the same). This annoys and saddens me.
A rave from me may be dubious in and of itself, but if you asked me: “Hey, Gregory! Who’s your fave film critic?!” I’d immediately blurt: “Gene Siskel!”
And then, if you said, “…but he’s dead, so who else?” — I’d state, very confidently and sincerely:
“Carina Chocano!”
Now…as to why:
Don’t ask me to pinpoint it. As far as I know, Carina Chocano and I have never met, thus, even though I like women who can articulate themselves, this is not some mere appreciation of how her eyes sparkle in the glow of celluloid at 24 fps, or how nicely her bottom may or may not be shaped, or what-have-you.
At first, when the Times announced Carina’s hiring, and I began (mostly in awkward breakfasting establishments, over crinkled, semi-used copies) to see her name and work in print, I bristled. Kindly note: As my own career ascended — and then was abruptly slammed down into the shitter by evil pigs who pay their mortgages with the blood of prostitutes — I was forced to behold the rise of Manohla Dargis (with whom I sat in many a screening room) — an outrageously terrible writer and critic if ever there was one (got another cutesy-ass cat “metaphor” for us, Manohla?) — and this was not only vaguely painful for me, it was also rather elaborately discouraging: To observe someone with absolutely no clue what she’s fucking talking about — but clearly with the ideal PR people “getting her back” — skipping like a moronic little ninny from the dubious L.A. Weakly (sic — if you editors even know what “sic” means) to the troubled L.A. Times — then taking a great big Whore Step to the apparently not-so-troubled New York Times — where, now, her word is taken by dwindling millions as gospel (and I vomit, I vomit, and I vomit some more).
Carina kinda saved me from the bitterness, though. Carina is no Mahohla. As I warmed to the prose of Ms. Chocano (and, again, I sincerely hope I’m not inadvertently damning her with mine), I began, gradually, to realise that this horror had nothing to do with gender — or, at its worst, with the terrible sense of emasculation which could have played out via me gushing my lifeblood into my work for six years and then having a “senior” “executive” Baby Boomer bitch (known, even by female employees of shitty ol’ New Times, as “that cunt in Denver”) cheerily drop the axe at me and very narrowly miss my pecker (and not for lack of trying — I’m not your ex-husband, scumbag).
It was a rough experience.
To carry on a bit more about female critics — I like ‘em! I mean, I really hope that gender is not the priority in appraising the words of an appraiser — but if it is, then I must say that women’s voices are desperately needed in the man’s man’s man’s world of movie criticism (and, obviously, in movies in general) — and, as long as they’re not stupid, I welcome them with respect and appreciation beyond words. Mix more women into the filmic fold, and you’re gonna get a richer overall picture. (This is the same reason I wanted Hillary to be President — she’s simply going to perceive things differently, and act differently, than a man would — yep, even differently than the current “messiah” with the silly and hella expensive infomercial brought to you by our fine friends at Deadwood [???] would; and, I believe, generally for the betterment of Life for all.)
(Incidentally: Moose Bitch is way too much of a tangent for this long note; but let’s just hope and pray that she’s sent packing [unfortunate pun] for the tundra next week.)
Back to female critics: One of the reasons I initially welcomed Carina’s reviews was that she tended to surprise me. And sometimes enlighten me. Plus she writes extremely well.
Unlike many, I found Pauline Kael to be a useless bore (if you shit on High Anxiety, you lose my faith and trust; it’s just that simple), and you already know what I think of Manohla (who was very, very obviously jockeyed into her cush position at the big old paper in New York — where she does not live, incidentally [she lives in L.A.] — to become “the new Kael” [barf.]). Unfortunately, cut out those two (and I do), and this does not leave us with many high-profile female film critics on the scene. (There are many more “indie” female film critics, whom I like, but how many eyeballs land on their notions? I lump that USA Today person in with Kael and Dargis — no, she’s worse: she’s bland.)
Thus have I turned to Carina Chocano. There was a day last year when I was once again breakfasting, and the L.A. Times Calendar section somehow wriggled onto my table, and in it were three excellent new reviews from her. There was one major review from Kenneth Turan — astoundingly, now the only full-time film critic remaining at the L.A. Times — you know, the L.A. Times in HOLLYWOOD — where they make MOVIES — but there were three from Chocano — and, no slight to Turan, but he’s hardly a compelling read — definitely an MOR kinda guy (which is probably why the company kept him).
But Chocano’s reviews delighted me — truly delighted me! I dashed off a quick email of praise. For not only did she excel at an art/science at which I had been striving and struggling, with various degrees of success, for years — but she was a woman kicking ass (in a smart way — very rare!) at the Times — which, less for any Feminist aspects of the achievement than for how her efforts released me from feeling like a jerk for disliking the drivel of other female critics (Ella Taylor at the Weakly, for instance, sucks so bad it’s toxic), filled me with pleasure and pride.
No joke.
Again, I’m pretty sure Carina Chocano and I have never met, and she did not respond to my little rave about her work, and I have nothing to gain by boosting her — but I like her, and the L.A. Times is fucking stupid for firing her.
In tribute, here are a few choice quotes from Carina Chocano:
On Stage Beauty (one of her first, and, notably, one of the last films I reviewed for my scumbag former employers): “Lovers aren’t quite as star-crossed these days as they used to be. Writers used to have things like arranged marriages and class barriers to keep their characters apart. Today, they have to make do with psychological love barriers, such as egos, identity confusion and job envy. These days, characters don’t have problems so much as issues.”
(O! An Opening Paragraph unscathed! I gasp with pleasure! -Ed.)
On National Treasure: “‘National Treasure’ hits every action-adventure beat, zinger and emotional trope right on cue — although, when I saw it at a test screening, the most appreciative laughs came when Harvey Keitel walked on screen as the FBI’s top dog.”
(Heh. -Ed.)
On 2046 (which I viewed, alone, at its last available screening at the very depressingly folded NuWilshire Theatre): “‘2046,’ like the sequentially numbered story within it, is a lyrical, Proustian meditation on loss, regret, love and time — the marching on of time being the cruelly inexorable constant in both.”
(I found it damned boring, actually — but I love the way she writes about it! -Ed.)
On Basic Instinct 2 “With ‘Basic Instinct 2,’ the ‘Basic Instinct’ franchise (who saw it coming?) enters its unhinged rococo phase.”
(Blimey! Forgot that one even existed! -Ed.)
And on Eastern Promises: “The much-discussed Turkish bath death-match scene, in which Nikolai, wearing a washcloth, is brutally attacked by a pair of fully clothed Chechens, is quite revealing. But as for its conveying the realistic ‘body-ness’ the director was after, well, it’s no nude ‘Borat’ wrestling scene. The terrifying vulnerability and malleability of the flesh doesn’t pack the same punch when the body in question is firmer than a boutique hotel mattress.
For all its naked fighting, as well as its finger-pruning, eye-impaling, throat-slitting and childbirth hemorrhaging, the movie is much less corporeal than the Cronenberg films of olden days and considerably more hidebound. Whereas his films once expressed a fierce protection of the self against external, anti-humanist forces, they now seem to insist, compulsively, on the need for order and everyone in his or her place. Even the brave Anna, after falling in love with her cruel-to-be-kind Russian, gives up her beloved dad’s motorcycle and her jeans and leather jacket for a floral-print dress and the pleasures of a backyard clothes-line. Who, exactly, is afraid of what?”
(See? She’s pretty great, isn’t she? One more, with feeling… -Ed.)
On A Very Long Engagement (which was essentially the movie that got me fired [feel free to ask about this anytime]): “All in all, Jeunet makes a pretty case for the idea that life is ruled by chaos and chance, but made meaningful and worthwhile by love.”
(Ah. -Ed.)
And if you’d like to read more, I can’t say I endorse her former company (bad move, guys), but here’s more indeed, from the absurdly talented Carina Chocano:
http://www.calendarlive.com/movies/chocano/more/
And more recent material (although the dates seem weirdly off-kilter):
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/movies/cl-chocano-sg,1,7315211.storygallery
(Quotes © Carina Chocano.)
~G
P.S. Also just found a great stream/podcast, within which host Meghan Daum astutely puts it: “Carina practices criticism the way I, at least, believe it should be practiced: We will never get a plain old ‘thumbs-up’ or ‘thumbs-down’ from a Carina Chocano review. Instead, she engages with movies not only as individual entities, but as pieces of a larger cultural framework. In an era when a lot of critics are content to assign a movie ‘***’ or ‘****’ and call it a day, Carina doesn’t just write reviews; she writes essays. And she not only critiques the movies, but truly discusses them.”
Hear-hear! I take off my hat, and bow. If you want to hear the whole interview, here ’tis:
http://www.zocalola.org/Audio/2007_12_30_zocalo.mp3
P.P.S. (or whatever) I also just found this:
http://archive.salon.com/health/feature/2000/02/08/i_smoke/index.html
…which indicates two things:
1. Carina Chocano, should she happen to see this posting, would very likely never approve of my approval of her.
&
2. I’m probably doomed to be attracted to a female “type” who seems smart but does totally fucking stupid things to herself, and then sneers about it.
(Still an awesome critic, though. If nobody else hires her, all she has to do is renounce her smoker’s soul forever, and buy or make me a glorious dinner, and I’ll consider letting her work for* me.)
(Plus: Although I love clotheslines in movies and music videos, I really loathe them in reality.)
(* = with)
Permalink
Posted in Glögg Is Life. at 3:42 am by Gregory
This post almost got called:
RIDING A BICYCLE WITH TWO FLAT TYRES TO WINNIPEG DURING A NUCLEAR WAR
…because I have spent most of the evening attempting to shuffle various components of the Site Proper, that I may then Re-Launch.
The thing is, I’m using various old computers which aren’t particularly friendly with one another, all of which proudly flaunt their glitches. (”Old” being the most absurd term here, as — although I have employed personal computers since the mid-80s — all of these units were designed and built during this Gregorian millennium [which really hasn't been going on very long yet -- although my fine friend J. just mentioned that The Phantom Menace {1999} was actually being filmed ten years ago...as good a marker as any...])
It is a very slow and arduous process, fraught on all sides with unrelenting peril.
Anyway, for those of you visiting ÜberCiné for the first time, welcome. (Yes, there is some irony intended in its name.) And for those of you who really wish that the Billy Bragg song would please go away already — well, tough: I’m an audio-type personality, and I happen to love that song.
(With proper apologies to those who loathe sound emerging unexpectedly from their computers.)
Will there be “time” to go back and amend various posts past? This I do not know. Hope so, though — as I am finally encountering a Transition I have been wanting:
I may drop off the “blogosphere” for a while.
I enjoy moments of clear perception (however fleeting), and this evening — after about five hours of dinking around with my Sandcrawler full of half-functional debris — I finally Realised:
I’ve been using this medium as an Outlet — but where the hell is my Inlet?
People read this — I know that — but, unfortunately, various variables have conspired to keep my “life” rather ferociously jumbled — sans contentment, and often (too often) sans Soul.
I’m not one to go in for complacency (”Hey, everybody! Obama will save us!”…NOT!), so this is not a worry — but living…existing…without at least a kernel of contentment…this is no longer something I can do.
It’s the transient nature of this environment that gets me down. Sorting through all manner of crap, I also “flipped” through some photos…gone people, brief people, basically wraiths who waft through, get one’s hopes up that something Good is on its way…and then they’re gone. Maybe an email once a year. If that. I have these photos of people I’ll probably never see again; and it’s freakish.
Thus, y’know, as the Portal Between Worlds opens this week, and so forth — plus I have a significant birthday hastening toward a collision with my psyche — I figure it’s as good a “time” as any (and better than most) to appraise this experiment for what it has been: A lot of rambling, some of it quite punchy, but mainly in service of no one — not even me!
These are simple and shallow “times,” and people — as near as I can figure — generally like having banners waved in their faces; they’re not much into attempts to comprehend personal intricacies.
Anyway, I’ll still put some sort of “presence” online, but as I stated a few weeks ago, I think this particular medium has served its purpose (i.e.: Keeping Enormously Hopeful And Enormously Lonely Me From Drinking Drano) — and it is “time” to shift myself into different forms of Usefulness.
If I may be allowed one huge, bellowing complaint — and I must highlight that current friends should not take this personally, for it does not concern them — it is that most of my friends and creative partners and co-workers over the years have been timid little bitches.
That’s been a painful, recurring theme for me — and to hell with it.
I keep glancing around and seeing all these hyperactive little freaks — mostly short, mostly badly educated — who are rich and powerful and having fun constantly; and you know what? you know what? you know what? — they are cordially invited to clean my toilet. I want what they’ve got. I’d use it better, and more people would benefit from it.
(Now…how to accomplish this…without literally giving anybody a blowjob…)
Anyway, yeah: Family sucks, jobs suck, friends mostly suck (not all; I truly love ya), ignorant pushy bitches suck, nation sucks, government sucks, Baby Boomers totally suck, and between the leaf-blowing “gardeners” and the screeching busybodies, I NEVER feel confortable in my own “home” — thus…
…well…
Without actually being an obsessed madman, I quote Allie Fox:
“So long, America! And have a nice day!”
(Even if I stay here, I really don’t fucking care anymore.)
Now…if I can help the world be a better place — not ruled by greed and slavery and torture and exploitation; but instead guided by creativity and compassion and intelligence and beauty — sure, I’ll do that, whenever, wherever.
But sitting here typing about how everybody in Stupidland is batshit crazy — although it’s almost entirely true, even I grow weary of it.
“You can always walk away…”
-Jane Siberry (who no longer exists, alas)
Erm…
Hallowe’en…yes, I like it, too. But I think it’s very badly misinterpreted in America. What it really is, of course, is Samhain — whereupon the gateway between the Spirit world and the Fleshly one is opened. This has great value — no matter how one interprets it — but I think that the value is severely tarnished and dented by the standard cheezeball American interpretations, such as this one:

See that? Now here’s the thing: Back in school — it was probably 1985 — I dressed up as Freddy Krueger for “Spirit Week”. Found the sweater and the (Indiana Jones) hat at secondhand stores. I turned a gardening glove, some cardboard “knives” (spray-painted silver) and some brass brads into Freddy’s “kill hand.” I was a kid. I was seeking the meaning of the archetype. (The black girls SCREAMED and SCREAMED and SCREAMED.)
That was twenty-three years ago.
Now the studios are re-booting that franchise, and attempting to turn “Freddy” into a horror icon to go along with Dracula and Frankenstein’s Monster and whatever.
I shrug. It was of its time, and then it was severely played out over too many sequels, and although it was at first genuinely scary, and then (for a while) genuinely witty — to foist some lame “new” version of this upon today’s unsuspecting kids seems, to me, quite rude.
And of course, Freddy is the commercial side of grisly horror. There’s a whole bunch of vile crap beneath him I simply cannot (and will not) tolerate.
Not being a prude — I grew up with slasher movies all around (notably, however, most of them were quite tongue-in-cheek in their delivery) — but all this ugliness; I’m very, very tired of it.
Here — although I’m very reverent toward the American Cinemathque (brilliant organisation), I can’t say that their version of “horror” really does it for me. Once again, were I to program an all-nite horror extravaganza, here’s what I would do:
1. Cat People (1942)
2. Cat People (1982)
3. SPECIAL MYSTERY FILM (One of my faves ever; friends are welcome to come over and watch it; I’ll probably do a little write-up on it later this week.)
4. The Rocky Horror Picture Show
5. The Howling II: Your Sister Is A Werewolf (a.k.a. Stirba, Werewolf Bitch)
6. The Host
7. Suspiria
8. Dracula (1958 — a.k.a. Horror of Dracula)
(A bit ambitious, perhaps — but I think these movies are terrific.)
And yes, I’m sure some readers here can come up with more geeky obscurities — but I’d be going for a certain sort of audience appeal (and at least a modicum of class).
And hey: What’re you going as for Hallowe’en?
Once again, I must admit I’m stuck. I haven’t been much of a physical show-off for years, thus…perhaps: Loser With Bad Haircut? This might be fun (and the MySpace kidz would say that anyway…)
Hm.
Well, whatever you do for Hallowe’en, may it be safe and reasonably sane — and also, may it give you the opportunity (take it!) for deep and revivifying reflection.
If anybody happens to run into my dead grandparents out there, please tell them I need to confer with them. (Ta.)
Music: The outrageously great score to Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, by John Williams in some sort of crazy genius mode.
Permalink
10.28.08
Posted in Glögg Is Life. at 11:42 am by Gregory
Ideas have swooped, however other matters have eclipsed them. If I had “blogged” last night, the Essay or Update would have splintered into three:
Women (mostly terrible)
America (mostly depressing)
&
Observations (mostly hilarious)
This morning, then, the title on my tongue was:
“This is your ‘life,’ Shithead.”
Now, obviously, these views are contorted by environment and other pressures — but I do find that, from any writer, I prefer the immediacy of an emotional response to the social aloofness of pure intellect. Be smart — if you can — but say what you feel!
“Politics. Politics, politics, politics, politics, politics…”
Considering wasting my main vote (I’ll vote decisively on the regional and local issues — mainly against mad development and greedy assholes) — because, although Obama is clearly the superior (remaining) choice in this race (with an actual VP, instead of a mere clown), it offends me how the Media have treated the whole schmeer: constantly and ostentatiously angling, first against Hillary, and now rather cartoonishly against the GOPs — all while painting Barry as some sort of “messiah”. Bullshit. If Barry had gotten into Show Biz for his big attention-fix, he’d be one of the smarter stand-up comedians.
America, please, let’s just try not to make absolutely everything into a sickeningly polarised caricature of what is in fact an almost infinitely complex reality.
Anyway, that’s why I may “waste” my vote — I refuse to be bullied by the Media — even for what seem to be good reasons.
More later; maybe.
Permalink
10.27.08
Posted in Glögg Is Life. at 12:42 am by Gregory
The basic gist for this post is: I’d rather just go to bed — but the site still needs updating, and I still have to deal with the 8-ball behind which I (to some extent) am, and a few people need work outta me, and…thus, no supremely ambitious post this time. Just a few blabby blips and I’m off the radar 2-nite.
First off: Happy Monday. Don’t you just love this whole “days of the week” system? Had your obligatory heart attack yet? Whee! Being human! Whee!
On to something bitterly amusing: Today I bought groceries. No — not that. But while I was standing in the very short queue, there was one person standing directly to the right of me. I stood beside her for a minute and did not recognise her (most girl-women around here are indistinguishable from one another). Then, as her transaction concluded, she turned: “the actress”! She hastened away without speaking or making eye-contact…while I let her do exactly that. And no — it’s not attraction played backward. She’s not evil or anything (truthfully, most often, she’s not anything), but really, nearly two years of: Bitching; Outrageous Overspending; Using Stupid Rich Guys; Period; Turning To Sludge In Front Of Hellish Daytime TV Every Day; Period Again (So Soon?); Treating Me Like “Gay Best Friend” (NOT An Honour); Period Again (How is this possible? And why do you have to tell me every time?); Lying To Everybody Constantly; and Wanting A Pomeranian (Unforgivable), I must say, being lonely has proved to be a massively more satisfying path (when the only other option was her). For those of you who garnered any Entertainment Value from my (and they were) rants, hey, good on ya — but Crazy People Who Are Incessantly Terrible (Even If, At First, They Seemed Moderately Cute And “Reasonable”) are way off my buffet now.
Goodbye, actress; have fun getting old!
On an Up note — and you may have noticed how quick the Universe is to fill-a-void, switch-channels, flip-a-bitch (North American slang for doing a 180º) — within an hour I was having lunch at a great restaurant with a lovely person of recent acquaintance but who is very cool indeed. Some shared interests, many not — but the sheer vibe of non-assholery and civility went a long way toward erasing the horror of all the rotten experiences with rotten girls I have endured over the years. Pardon my candour.
Then, ce soir, those splendid Gallic movie dudes put on their Fest again, and this time we observed the awards presentation for their impressive array of documentaries — and then Linda Harrison popped out (in your dreams, geek-manchild!) to celebrate the fortieth anniversary of the original movie, Planet of the Apes.
It’s a movie I like a lot. I would have done it differently, but it does indeed stand the test of “time” (and lots of it).
Interesting: I was never a Charlton Heston fan: His overbaked machismo (and ginormous horse-teeth) always pushed me away, rather than drawing me in — and yet, I’ve always respected his impressive body of work (as opposed to some, who probably mainly respected his impressive body). Recently, P. and I finally saw El Cid. Add that to the ones I particularly appreciate (Apes, Omega Man, sure, why not: The Ten Commandments) and (yes, I know, I know: he made a few others) and it’s undeniable, that he was a great big blessing to the art and business of the Motion Picture Industry.
The gun-nut shit really put me off, though — HEY, EVERYBODY — GET THIS AND GET IT GOOD: GUNS KILL PEOPLE. GUNS ARE BAD. THE ONLY PURPOSE OF A GUN IS TO DO BAD THINGS, SO GET RID OF ALL GUNS NOW!!! Love, Gregory — and thus, as Heston was quite a bit before my time (unless you count his cameo in Ape drag in the terrible, terrible remake), his crazy-ass worldview tended to obscure my ability to appreciate his acting.
Plus, frankly, his acting is pretty damned hammy — but that’s part of its charm (and power).
I mention this because this evening, in the presence of the Jules Verne Fest’s founders (one of whom was/is a very dedicated Heston fan), I enjoyed the rare opportunity of appreciating Heston’s career in Fast Forward mode — that is, via a sort of “Greatest Hits” montage.
This allowed me to like Charlton Heston a lot more. (Later, I got into a very mild discussion with a perversely Middle American friend of mine, who, strangely, sided with Michael Moore about that awkward interview sequence with Heston in the otherwise sensationally awesome Bowling for Columbine. This surprised me, as I expected my friend to side with the gun-nut. My argument — as such — was simply that Moore was out of line. One does not go into the home of an interview subject — any interview subject — with the goal of ridiculing them [or at least slapping them with a hundred pounds of cold dead guilt] — and especially not into a gun-nut’s house! On the street or at a public appearance, fine. At home, no. At the very least, I feel that Moore should have held his horses and gotten a real discussion out of Heston — before sticking it to him for being an insensitive cad.)
But, yeah, the montage allowed me to appreciate Heston’s good side; which was nice.
I’ll strive to write something more substantial in the next few days, but in the meantime: Merci beaucoup, Jules Verne Adventure Film Festival! Beau travail, mes amis! Bonne chance!
Oh, yeah, plus these guys beat the Oscars (by a few months) to the Dead List. I’m sure there were others (and at least one here they did not mention), but here I shall afford each of these deceased cinématic artists a brief nod:
Paul Newman: Your face remained very consistently shaped; thank you for that.
Sydney Pollack: You made Three Days of the Condor; thank you for that.
Bill Melendez: You literally gave Snoopy a voice; thank you for that.
George Carlin: You once asked: “What does it mean to pre-board? Do you get on before you get on?”; thank you for that.
Stan Winston: Pumpkinhead is underrated; thank you for that.
Heath Ledger: Your Joker was not what I wanted, but actually pretty darned good; thank you for that.
Anthony Minghella: Breaking and Entering I liked much more than The English Patient; thank you for that.
Ernest Borgnine: Hey, man, I loved you in — wait, you’re not dead; you’re jumping rope!!!
(Nice new book, too…)
and
Charlton Heston: That original trailer for Planet of the Apes I could put on endless loop all day; thank you for that.
Plus, of course, many not-particularly-famous people died this year, so here is a bow to them:
^
And now, as we slide deeper into sweet Autumn, here’s wishing (most of) you a glorious pre-Hallowe’en week. If you live in L.A., you’ll have all sorts of Cinématic opportunities to celebrate the season. Here’s a taste:
Hallowe’en Night: 7:30 pm, Aero Theatre, Santa Monica: Abbot and Costello Meet Frankenstein (one of my faves!) plus Abbot and Costello Meet The Killer: Boris Karloff
(I know: Who wants to be sitting in a movie on Hallowe’en night? But in L.A., it really is a lot better than being bludgeoned or whatever.)
Also Hallowe’en Night: Dusk-to-Dawn Horrorthon at the Egyptian Theatre (where I attended my first-ever movie prémiere, for…um…Zombie High, in 1987), in Hollywood (good stuff? — this bunch actually sounds too nasty; I much more sincerely recommend the terrific Hammer films on Thursday the 30th and Saturday the 1st [one GREAT one each night with Christopher Lee! {and three in all with Peter Cushing}], plus two classic versions of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde on Sunday the 2nd!)
Also Hallowe’en Night: The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari, with live accompaniment, midnight, at the fabulous Nuart, West L.A. (The infinitely enjoyable Rocky Horror Picture Show screens at the Nuart, as usual, on Saturday at midnight [or sometime thereafter...])
ALL WEEK at Cinefamily (formerly the Silent Movie Theatre, Fairfax): Awesome season-specific programming including everything from mid-period Wes Craven to a Lucio Fulci triple-feature, PLUS William Castle’s THE TINGLER and the Cinefamily Hallowe’en Party, Hallowe’en Nite!
Plus, of course, here comes the third annual Aero Theatre Dusk-to-Dawn Horrorthon: NOT on Hallowe’en, but on 1 November (and the first quarter of 2 November), which will include a great many scary things plus Peter Jackson’s Dead Alive (presumably the movie that got him the Tolkien gig — or was it Meet the Feebles?…)
And that’s just a little bit of what’s going on around the region this Hallowe’en. (Knowing L.A., there’s probably also some gathering where you can help pierce and otherwise molest a real goat, or possibly blow a producer’s nephew for a chance at a P.A. gig — but I’ll leave those for you to find on your own.)
So it goes.
I have one of my all time fave “horror” movies on VHS, and will be more than happy to screen it for friends anytime this week. (It’s not particularly horrific, and it’s not yucky, but it is hella entertaining.)
I had a nice conversation with my mother this evening; she seems to have grown ears again.
(The whole “not listening — at all” thing has definitely wearied me — and nearly completely killed any remaining faith I may have had in America. Gimme something good. Gimme something good…)
Okay, that’s enough for tonight.
Music: Vince Guaraldi’s score for It’s the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown
(Airs this Tuesday night…CBS, is it?)
Permalink
10.26.08
Posted in Glögg Is Life. at 12:42 am by Gregory
Somewhere, right now, The Rocky Horror Picture Show is screening…
We went to the Jules Verne Festival’s celebration of Battlestar Galactica. Way cool. Saw Gort. Gort’s doing fine.
Here’s Gort with Ringo Starr:

(Incidentally: The Rocky Horror Picture Show IS one of the Top Thirteen Films EVER; and which one, exactly, is coming soon…)
(Oh, and the stupid valet hastily slammed my coat in the car-door, thereby crunching the switch on my pride-and-joy new/used Canon camera — thus, I only now discover, rendering it incapable of taking still photos…and this has, admittedly, kinda thrown me off; at worst, it amounts to retroactively muttering: “Hey, asshole, did I say: ‘PLEASE SLAM THE CAR DOOR ON ME?!” — and, at best, it reminds me (yet again) that material things are fleeting, and undeserving of a mature human’s focus. Oh, plus the sub-lesson: Hasty assholes fuck shit up.)
Song: The pretty little reprise of “Science Fiction Double Feature” at the end of the movie.
Permalink
10.24.08
Posted in Glögg Is Life. at 11:42 am by Gregory
So there I was, on the way to Vegas…
Sometimes you plan life; sometimes life plans you; this was a case of the latter.
I had grown weary of — well, not of the freezing rain of the PacNW; but rather of always having to enjoy it alone (plus hippies smell bad and don’t know the meaning of “comb”), thus, I flew down to Sunny Stupidland (never guessing that the silly Canadian girl who was supposed to be watching over my first pet rabbit would, in the process, allow him to die of hypothermia; thanks!)
Unless I am mistaken — for the hot desert highway tends to blur “time” — this was early 1994? It was probably Spring. I was in the backseat of a car with two college friends, and, being much nearer the speakers, I spent the trip not hearing much of my friends, but mainly being kind of uncomfortably hot and having the first Counting Crows album, the second Tori Amos album and something called “Jerky Boys” (which I loathed) force-fed through my cochleae.
When I could manage to hear my friends, though, they often spoke of Christina Ricci.
Now let’s see — by my Wiki-assisted calculations, at that “time,” Christina Ricci would have been a little over fourteen years old.
It always grosses me out when friends (of either gender) get all drooly over some celeb they’d like to bag — but on this trip, not even having seen The Addams Family yet (although I was lucky enough to wander through its sets at Paramount — pretty cool!), the most I could think to say was:
“She’s a kid, isn’t she?”
(Note: Echoes of this would appear a decade later, when I’d hear adult women saying they’d like to “have” Rupert Grint. How lovely.)
One friend’s response: “Oh, my God!” (Imagine him shaking his hand diagonally to this.)
So it goes in Hollywood.
But we were in the middle of the big, ugly desert — and I was much more concerned with figuring out whether these guys would want to make a band or make movies together (turns out, they have) than with who this “Christina Ricci” kid might be.
But the name stuck.
(I hated Vegas.)
Years pass.
Actresses with names like “Julia Roberts” and “Sandra Bullock” keep flitting past — but, honestly, although I am forced to notice them, they mean nothing to me.
Also in ‘94, I go to John Duigan’s Sirens at the local, Indian-named multiplex in the PacNW. Four times! I love that movie!!!
I don’t (then or now) like Sirens for the obvious “Cinemax” elements — but, in a world overstuffed with Robertses and Bullocks, I like the actresses in it, a lot. (It’s a lovely movie.)
Throughout, though — with the occasional exception of an Audrey Tautou or a Shirley Henderson — actresses just haven’t stuck with me. It’s like there’s nothing there, nothing real.
Thus it is with some reservations that I — apropos of nothing — briefly revere Christina Ricci — but I can tell you one thing for certain:
It’s not some weird and icky crush.
It’s more like this: Glancing over the list, I have seen approximately half of the movies in which Ricci has appeared.
But I like her work in them!
There are so many horrid actresses out there that one must reason that a lethal mix of Idiotic Male Producers and Stupid Little Whores is conspiring to snuff out all that is potentially Good about a female human appearing in motion pictures. (Where, these days, is our Hepburn? And has a female performer ever been funnier or more endearing than Madeline Kahn? Sheer genius, that one.)
I Search, though — in this case, via mostly celluloid and, increasingly, High Def — for those Women who are actually worth the trouble to watch (and there are very few, and if they ain’t got it, they ain’t got it).
(With a thousand pardons to Michelle Yeoh and Sophie Okonedo and others; for the sake of simplicity, I seem to be aiming mainly Whitey here — but this is due only to my own ignorance at retaining names and cultures, and not to any lack of appreciation…oh, hell, I should probably write a Women of World Cinéma book or something…it’s just that, growing up with asinine sisters, and black girls in the gym tearing out each other’s hair [frequently], I’m still struggling for those first few sweet dates with a lady I actually like — which will massively open my capacities for appreciating people outside my immediate circle…or will it? Hm. I do okay, I guess. Could do better. But who couldn’t?)
Anyway, I reflect upon Casper and The Ice Storm and Buffalo ‘66 and Sleepy Hollow (and those are all from the previous Gregorian millennium!), and I start noticing: Hm…this Christina Ricci…she makes cool choices.
Most guys my age still want to put their thing in Winona “Ryder” (which may indicate a latent desire to put their thing in Johnny Depp; but that’s another Essay) — but things don’t even enter into this; rather, for an actress, it is readily apparent that Christina Ricci is doing great work!*
(*Note: This may be akin to stating, “For a serial killer, she’s totally nice!” — but I’m striving for the Appreciation angle here.)
I have interviewed Tautou (twice; very pleasant), Anne Hathaway (kinda dorky), Denise Richards (a totally vapid bore) and Keira Knightley (shrug). With appropriate appreciation to Tautou (mainly for being French and having the good sense to get herself in front of Jeunet), none of these actresses reveals the range and ambition of Christina Ricci.
A few years ago, I kept getting assigned to review Prozac Nation — and then it never seemed to get released. I’d like to see Penelope — as it very much sounds like “my kind of movie.” And in between — hey, Ricci is GREAT in Pumpkin, GREAT in Monster, GREAT in Home of the Brave (excellent movie, worth seeking); and CUTE in the otherwise truly troubling Speed Racer (I sorely wanted Tautou to play Trixie — but the compromise turned out to be acceptable, if very flatly directed).
Perhaps your thoughts are now turning to: “He’s lonely and single — is this going to be like that Sean Young thing?” And…nah.
Actress…for one thing.
Plus, although the Small’n'Aggressive types usually seem to dig me (both genders; alas, alas), when I sat down to view Black Snake Moan — which was mainly a matter of convenience — I once again appreciated Ricci’s very strong performance…but in the scenes where she’s clearly “getting even with Daddy,” I just had to go: “Ew.”
I hate Cliché.
Incidentally, although “we” awarded Black Snake Moan our ÜberCiné prize for “Money Shot” last year, this actually had nothing to do with nudity or sexuality. In particular, I was genuinely knocked out by the image of stupid little Justin Timberlake wielding a gun at Samuel Jackson — and Jackson just staring down that barrel, eyes ablaze with certainty and hellfire, daring him, daring him. I loved that moment. I found that one moment more gripping and powerful than the entirety of any recent superhero movie. There was Truth in it!
And would I turn down an opportunity to have Ricci chained to my radiator? Well, it’s like this: I would unchain her.
To comment briefly upon Ricci’s work: I see a girl-woman who immerses herself in her rôles, and yet cannot completely hide herself in them. Sometimes she’s squeaky, small, what we used to call a waif. Sometimes she’s perverse and mildly disturbing. Sometimes she’s cute as hell. Sometimes she’s sort of…off. In the midst of these rôles, though (and others I have not seen; I have a hard time going to Woody Allen movies anymore), I detect a Brave Soul. Brief Wiki-ing reveals a smattering of “whatever” tattoos and a couple of dogs — and I don’t really want to know the rest. But onscreen, tell me, how many American girls who haven’t even reached thirty yet can reveal such a wide spectrum of human character through their work? Few. Very few.
That’s why I’m impressed. I dunno. It’s not a big deal. But it is a nice feeling for me — to glance about and see an American actress I actually like!
It turns out that there are way too many photos of Ricci online (mostly kinda icky ones), so I’ll leave this photo essay at a brief two — from which you may draw your own conclusions (if any):


Glib closing statement. (Hey…beats The Hours.)
I’m going to go think about something substantive now.
Have a nice week-end.
~G
Permalink
10.23.08
Posted in Glögg Is Life. at 9:42 pm by Gregory
These things mainly get made up as I go along, and tonight’s ÜberWånk (™) is no exception. My second-oldest-and-still-is-my friend who begins with a ‘D’ rang up from somewhere on location, and among many topics discussed was the rock band Journey. A plethora of details ensued — from the popular FRONTIERS coin-op videogame to the band’s recent appearance on “Ellen” to me suggesting that the hit ballad “Faithfully” might have been better named, “Don’t Worry, Honey — I Probably Won’t Fuck Many Groupies Whilst On Tour
” — and then…
…I started thinking about Christina Ricci.
Now here’s the thing — I really don’t like actresses. Dated a couple-three: utterly terrible. At best, exhibitionists; at typical, whores. It’s like they’re not really people — they’re these creepy “personality-things” flitting about, mostly pointlessly — unless they’re onscreen, struggling in vain to make peace with Daddy (by showing the whole world their tits; go figure).
Being single and an excellent catch, I am forced to Search — and there are many, many actresses (and wannabes, and has-beens) around here — and over and over I keep learning my lesson, which is: Don’t Bother. (Fortunately, the lesson, in this regard, has now shrunk to the point of being super-quick and painless: Approximately a millisecond of: “Hey, should I?…nah!” And that’s that.)
I was already thinking about Christina Ricci, though, because recently I was digging through mountains of old interview and otherwise cassettes (hey, I have original songs I forgot I recorded!), mainly looking for my Cyndi Lauper interview from The Opportunists (which was cool in all possible ways) — and in the midst of that, I found many treasures, two of which are:
1. The recording of the first and only time I ever got to hear Kurt Vonnegut speak in person (WOW!) — and I didn’t even remember that I had had a tape-recorder with me!
&
2. The entirety of the audio from the movie Pumpkin (which I liked enough to get quoted on the box; or did I?)…because when I was severely sleep-deprived and “preditor”-battered and otherwise terribly stressed around that chapter of my life, in addition to scribbling notes through an entire movie, sometimes I would audio-tape some or all of it (in the latter case, at half-speed) — the better to recall, accurately, the dialogue, scenarios and sound-mix.
In recent days, I had mostly forgotten about Pumpkin, but it’s a pretty great little movie, very amusing and occasionally quite insightful, and it ends on a total doozie of a freeze frame and a song I totally love.
That got me thinking: Who is this Christina Ricci person?
Actress.
I didn’t bother.
When D. brought up Journey, though — and especially being on “Ellen” — my mind started whirring: “Is Journey a fave band among crazy lesbians?” Which, of course, emanates from the movie Monster — another feature film I reviewed and did not expect to like…but did. (Well…let us say that I strongly respected and appreciated it; I’m not particularly keen on sitting through it ever again.)
Way to win an Oscar, though. I recall being up in Santa Barbara for the film fest about four and a half years ago, and I was at a private party celebrating Charlize Theron — and I stood next to her briefly (she’s tall), and I thought: “Hey, is there something here I should do or say?” And there wasn’t. But she seemed reasonably pleasant (under such incredibly socially artificial circumstances). Nice house, too.
This is part of the Search, you see. Another (wholly unrelated?) example would be when Mean Girls came out (a couple of months later), and I did an interview for that, and I was as desperately lonely then as I am now (heh)…(heh?), and I thought: “Hey, this Tina Fey person seems acceptable. I don’t watch TV anymore, so I really don’t even know who she is — but she was funny in the movie, and the script is pretty good for a diluted remake of Heathers, and she’s kinda friends with an associate once or twice removed…so maybe I should have dinner with her and then put my thing in her and make babies or something.”
I mean, she’d be doing the lioness’ share of the babymaking, but I, you know, the seed…
Heh!
Anyway, somebody said, “She’s married,” and I was all, “that’s that then.” Then tonight, whilst viewing the “Road to Germany” episode of Family Guy online for the fourth time this week (*****, say I — and I still don’t watch TV, but this thing is 100% brill), I accidentally caught a few minutes of 30Rock (a title which has, up to now, puzzled me) — and, apart from Alec Baldwin (who yelled at me on the phone at Paramount shortly after Red October) now closely resembling an actual pig (very unappealing-looking man, that piggy-faced Alec), my main impression of the show was this:
It doesn’t matter if it’s newspaper columnists, comediennes or sitcom writers — I really strongly dislike the writing that women do when they think they’re so damned cute and funny, but actually are not. (You know: Shoe jokes or whatever.)
I just watched about three minutes of 30Rock and reasoned, “Whew, it sure is a good thing I didn’t put my thing into Tina Fey!” (although I concede that she has a cool surname)
Which doesn’t lead us — at all — back to Christina Ricci, but heck: my Glögg (©), my choice of segues (or not).
Dig:
I, Gregory, sincerely believe that Christina Ricci makes great movies, and I feel that she is one of the finest artists working in a popular medium today.
(There! I did it! I said something nice about an actress!)
The first brief glimmer of awareness rises like an hallucination from a hot desert highway…
TBC
Permalink
10.22.08
Posted in Glögg Is Life. at 11:42 pm by Gregory
First of all the Death bit: I was in the shower yesterday — and for me the shower is the equivalent of your yoga or massage or whatever costs a bunch of money only this doesn’t — and, the noise of this hellishly noisy place temporarily blotted out by the blatter, I fell to Reminiscing…and realised that the reason I: A. First found it difficult to begin the eulogies for my recently departed friends; and B. Am now finding it difficult to finish them (if, indeed, one’s reflections of a departed friend are ever truly “finished”) is that…I miss them. It hurts to think about them. Or, rather, it hurts to consider that their “narrative arcs” as human beings are well and truly over. I don’t buy into Death bringing people closer to the Dead Person — you can stand over their grave and talk all day; it’s not for (or with) them — it’s for you. But will you ever break bread (or tofu) together again? Nope. And beyond all that, for all the wonderful people who are still here, I nonetheless feel that the world was very severely robbed in the process of plucking out Brandi and Mela. They just…shouldn’t be gone yet.
But anyway, if the hideous stresses of Doing Life Solo In The Big City happen to abate enough in the next few days for me to go back and — at least — sufficiently recall my absent friends in words, then this will be Good. And — for selfish reasons (which I figure they’d both endorse — in a smart and healthy way) — it’ll liberate me a bit, too.
My alleged “dad” goes in for surgery in a week, too. Haven’t spoken a word with him in nine years. Some people’s dads are dead already; some people’s dads they wish were dead already; I simply got handed a “dad” whose primary goal in life — and he strives at it with intense abandon — is to make everybody else feel as shitty as he apparently does. Toss in that he’s also kinda stupid, and it brings me terrible unhappiness.
Thus…great…he goes “under the knife” next week (it is a mechanical problem, more than a chemical one; odds of success are high) — and yet, nonetheless, ignorant Midwestern men with horrid eating habits who smoked for decades and subsist, emotionally, primarily on bitterness — they don’t usually live too much longer than the age where he already is.
Dumb, pushy people, they’d be, all, “Go, like, make amends, dude! While you still can!” But the thing is this:
HE IS THE ONE WHO MADE EVERYTHING FUCKING TERRIBLE.
When the elder is rotten, sometimes the very best the younger can do is to flee.
Shit.
I guess what hurts the most is that I have always, to the best of my ability, done the right thing. There are a lot of really, really bad stories out there — but I haven’t been living those. And yet he has always treated me as if I have been.
After thirty years of that — and I struggled with it, I worked on it, I gave everything I could toward building Understanding (plus — I was ambitious! — Enlightenment) — I had to give up, push him away, at least give myself the chance of living a happy and productive life.
He’s no fun to be around — it’s miserable — but I guess I am worrying, a bit selfishly, about what will happen to me when he does die (which he will, sooner or later).
There’s no love there, no support-system — not even any good ideas! So it’s not like I’d be losing some great source of inspiration or motivation in my daily life.
If, however — extremely theoretically — if there were a big, arrogant, bearded dickhead in the clouds who, you know, made everything and whatever, I would like to throw a big rotting fish at his stupid dickhead face to get his attention, and then ask him this:
“HEY! DICKHEAD! HOW COME AMERICAN DADS GENERALLY SUCK MOTHERFUCKING ASS?!?”
It would be helpful to know.
And with that, we move on to a different form of “checking out” — and the amusing real-life dialogue I recently experienced first-hand.
Yesterday, I dealt with three cashiers. The first was merely polite, and nothing amusing happened there. The second was two, actually — the girl ringing me through and the girl doing the bagging, at one of those obscenely overpriced natural foods markets. Cashier Girl said, “You didn’t hear that, did you?” and I said, “What?” “Oh, she [Bagger Girl] was just saying what she’s going to be for Halloween.” Me: “Oh, really? What’s that?” Cashier Girl (to Bagger Girl): “I don’t think you should–” Bagger Girl: “I said I wanna be a Slut this year.” [It never even occurred to me, in the moment, to think: "Whaddaya mean, this year?" Honest.] Then they both giggled mildly, and I, whilst punching in my PIN, said: “Well, whatever sets you free for the night, that’s what you should do.” [I said this because I know, from experience, that they're going to do it anyway.] Cashier Girl: “True, that!” Bagger Girl: “Thanks!” And off I went.
A few hours later, I was at some drugstore with a stupid name (the drugstore, I mean — well…both of us, actually), and at first I thought that the only available cashier was that gross guy whom I witnessed being arrested on the job earlier this year. But it wasn’t — this guy simply has the same hair. I stepped up, and he was talking with the guy in front of me in the queue. Cashier Guy: “Well, there you go — thanks.” Other Guy: “Yeah…yeah…uh-huh…you know, I’m headin’ up to San Francisco this weekend.” [Note: Other Guy's transaction was clearly over; and Cashier Guy was merely being polite in order to avoid making waves.] Cashier Guy: “Oh, yeah?” Other Guy: “Yep. Going up to the zot tick rot tick baw.” [Another note: I heard what the guy said and found it comprehensible -- but only because Thomas Dolby and George Clinton actually performed at that thing together in 2006. Cashier Guy, however, was stumped.] Cashier Guy: “To the what???” I remained patient. Other Guy (noting that not only was I standing right there, but by discussing his weekend activity, he was wasting my time): “The Exotic Erotic Ball. Yeah. Mm-hm.” Cashier Guy: “Oh. What’s that about?” [Yet another note: Other Guy has never been trained in moving out of the way so that you don't waste the time of strangers. I can't move my Reese's cups forward toward the scanner until he moves his Exotic Erotic ass the hell out of my way.] Other Guy: “Well, it’s a– you know…” [Final note in this sequence: At this point, I was very tempted to help out: "You know -- where a bunch of stupid retards prance around in rubber 'clothes' cut to accentuate their erectile bits. Totally fab. May I have my peanut butter cups rung up now?" But I didn't. Alas.] Other Guy: “It’s a– it’s an adult event.” Cashier Guy: “Oh. Cool. Have fun.” And that was it. You had to be there — but it’s certainly better that you weren’t.
And then I ate eight Reese’s cups inside of sixteen hours.
Happy days, these.
Bonus Material:
1. Eating in a lower-middlebrow establishment today, I discovered a few horrifying pop-musical things: 1. Annie Lennox’ cover of “Train in Vain” is The Worst Thing I’ve Ever Heard (it actually surpasses “Walking On Broken Glass” in the Suck department); 2. Stevie Nicks and that Counting Crows guy really need to be put out of their misery (and never again be allowed within 100 yards of a microphone); and 3. Some soul chick (not going to bother to Google) opens her song with cooing over some guy’s Escalade (my least fave vehicle in the world — apart from actual military vehicles) — and then repeats her genuinely hilarious refrain: “Even if you were broke; My love don’t [doesn't -Ed.] cost a thing!” — which, especially when combined with the other punishments and how women really are “round here,” nearly made me choke on the guacamole.
[In keeping with my promise of earlier this week, these complaints are hereby filed in the interests of being "nice" to the psyches of smart people with good taste -- as well as for the greater good of the "artists" themselves.]
…and…
2. Speaking of food, I have a friend who waits tables, and she informed me this evening that a small gaggle of British tourists ran up a $75 tab and tipped her $2 for it. What this means is that she still has to tip out the bus-staff, plus she gets taxed on 15% of the tourists’ tab — meaning that it cost her about $15 to serve them!
People.
Always tip properly; even if you “can’t.”
(I sincerely hope that, among many quotes, that one sticks with me. It is Nice.)
Well, anyway, although I am always putting new touches on ever-evolving projects, the only significant Update this week is that I may be detaching from L.A. and retreating to a cold and quiet place for the next few months. “Wood-chipper” and “The Shining” jokes have already been made (partly by me), however, since I don’t drink, do crimes for Bill Macy, inhabit previous lifetimes or have a freakish son with Olive Oyl, there’s little cause for alarum (sic). Mainly it’s just not having any real purpose here. Socially, I strive to do my part — but otherwise only a complete idiot would fail to see that enduring L.A. alone without a proper income and position and income and income is very, very, very far from being Good for the Soul.
Will I return? Probably. But at Almost-Forty I don’t have any roots here (it’s hard for anyone to put down roots into a century of exhaust soot), or any Scene consistent enough to make it worth my while — thus, just like the rest of America, I prepare now to Downsize.
If anybody has a vacant cottage in a civilised country, however, that they’d like to lend to me for a while, I promise to care for it well, and I accept in advance. No funny business.
~G
Song: “Country House” by Blur (I LOOOOOOOOOOVE this song.)
[*Blimey! There's a video! And it's GREAT! I prolly should have sat still and watched telly in 1995! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2BBfv9WK_w]
Permalink
« Previous entries Next Page » Next Page »